Dana Beal on the Marijuana March in New York City

I sincerely hope the Cam Neely Foundation gets some of the profits for you using my name Zen. I'd hate to have to sue you for it. Or, and it would be cheaper, give me a few hits of acid, some mescaline, a big jug of whiskey, 1/4lb of the mary, maybe some peyote, a train ticket to the desert, food enough to last 3 months and water too, etc. I think I need a vision quest, perhaps we could all use one.

I have known Dana Beal off and on for as long as I can remember. And in that entire time he has not changed his name once, like Richard Alpert did, to Ram Dass. If Dana Beal is to be trusted then the obvious question is why didn't he change his name like Richard Alpert did...to Ram Dass. That is the basic premise of the Nothingness which Dana Beal represents to me or the Being and Nothingness of which Jean Paul Satre wrote. Is Dana Beal trying to imply that he is afraid of strokes or that he is equating Bush with already having one and that is why the world should follow his lead...into oblivion? Need I go on? Or to put the question more succicently why is the Marijuana march kicked off in NYC in May when everyone knows the harvest season...is in October?

I have known Beal to intimately bogart a joynt or two on more than one occasion by pretending he doesn't know that he is smoking one. Has he in fact been conspiring with himself to bogart entire truck loads of the stuff all winter only to sell it at an enormous profit in the spring world wide so that people will be confused by his stoned philosophy and give it away for Nothingness at the kick off? Again I ask...what is he hiding from and even more importantly...where is he hiding it?

All these questions can all be answered in my forthcoming book I am thinking about writing which is based on the life of Tina Turner and is appropriately called, What's Remy Got To Do With It? Needless to say answers are a dime a dozen and always easy to come up with but as any fool knows it is the hard questions...that are the hardest to ask and whether or not this is because they are the only ones worth asking...are obviously none of your business according to Dana Beal.

What was the symbolism of placing a woman on his left and a man on his right? Is he trying to claim to be a fallen from grace and misunderstood Talmudic scholar or that he is a Christian who is implying that women are secular and therefore the cause of all evil as it was foretold in Deuteronomy? What about the primary directive and what are the three laws of robotics that he so deftly manages to avoid discussing? Why was Euclid never once mentioned? Are we to assume that Ophelia complexes are any less easy to have fulfilled...than Oedipal ones? I think you can see where we are headed with this line of questioning.

And I could go on...but what's the use? I got turned down for another dance tonight.

---------
"There is no laughter in the covens of the witch...some clever doctor went and sterilized the bitch...and the only man with energy yes the revolution's pride...he trained a 100 women just to kill an unborn child!"...Leonard Cohen