Ron Paul ~ Know The Whole Truth

Ron Paul Will Not Save America! Get this simple and obvious fact through your heads! Anyone, anyone, anyone associated with, affiliated with, connected to the current establishment known as the United States of America is for the establishment! Insanity is repeating the past expecting the future to be different. A vote for Ron Paul is a vote to continue the insanity that now represents the American Dream, Land of Greed & Home of the Depraved!

The Truth About Ron Paul
By Liz Delong
Let's get something straight everyone, Ron Paul is part of the
establishment. He is not anti-establishment in any way that will
support the people. He will not suffer the fate of those who do
challenge the establishment because he is a mere decoy for the
liberals and the people who feel the unrest rising in the back of
their throats. He is a pacifier, sent out to distract and pacify the
public. He is supposed to be the hope that we so desperately are in
search of that we have neglected, once again, to investigate anyone
who we throw our support behind.

After being duped by the Democrats from John Kerry to the 110th
Congress, I will do whatever it takes to ensure that I will NOT be
made a fool of again. The Democrats who were elected to the majority
in both houses of our congress were the last of that foolishness.
They made promises to impeach the criminals in the White House to
bringing our troops home and have failed miserably on both and have
managed the lamest excuses yet, for their failures. Ron Paul is not
much different then the complacent Democrats or the old school
republicans. Watch what they do and not what they say.

Let's talk about what Ron Paul does and not what the guy says. All
politicians lie and it doesn't take a genius to figure that one out.
Rather then believing a liar or taking a politician at his word how
about taking a look at his record for once. Oh yeah, there are those
votes that the Ron Paul fans cite again and again as if they mean
something. We all know that the lack of accountability up there on
criminal hill is full vested in the recorded votes for the
individuals just as it is for the failures and empty promises of
either party.

With all the decorations and attachments to proposed legislation
meant to entice more support for the bill so it will become law, one
could essentially be voting to stop funding for the Iraq War but at
the same time, sending more troops over in a surge. One could be
voting against a war and voting for more office space for the
Congressional members at the same time. The attachments on the bills
don't even have to be relevant to the bill, itself. It's a great way
to avoid accountability and along with non-recorded votes, there is
no meaning or true sense of what a politicians stands for by looking
solely at his voting record.

The best way to get a sense about one's ideas and intentions in the
political realm is by looking at the bills they introduce/sponsor.
Look at them in their original form as introduced and before the
committee marks them up. Look at them before the wording is changed
to better serve the political farce called public service that the
liars on criminal hill masquerade for all of us people they pillage
and rape and kill and lie to. For in this organic form, one sees
exactly what the politician intends or how one feels about issues.

Well, Ron Paul is no different then the rest of the lyin', rotten,
murderous, cheatin', dirty, rotten rat bastards. He is contradictory
in every sense of the word and while he may have voted against the
war, it was only because he believes that congress should declare
war and not the president. Even still, his main offense with the
continued war is not the blood and the guts of over a million
innocent people, splattered all over the bomb ridden streets in
Iraq - it's the goddamned cost of it all. His claims of being anti-
war are false. Voting against something does not make one anti-
anything. He takes no active role in bringing the troops home or
ending the war in Iraq. What has Ron Paul done over the last three
Congress's (108th, 109th and 110th) that is indicative of his anti-
war stand - in terms of legislation that he has introduced and
sponsored. NOTHING, that is what he has done.

Please note that Ron Paul sponsors more legislation then most
members of Congress and averages 67 per Congress except in the 110th
Congress - he sponsored approximately 65 just the first session. I
researched the Ron Paul legislation as it was introduced and as he
sponsored it - in it's organic form and this is what I have found.

1) HR 2511 - this piece of legislation postpones the closure of
bases that were scheduled to close due to previous legislation (that
he didn't introduce) until the Secretary of Defense and Homeland
Security deem it so. Obviously, he thinks both the Secretary of
Defense and Homeland Security have things they need to do before
this previously sponsored and passed legislation by one of his
colleagues can actually be forced. Postponing the closure of bases
overseas or here at home is not anti-war.

2) HR 3216 - this one is nothing but a bunch of business for
blackwater and the description of it is as follows:

The President of the United States is authorized and requested to
commission, under officially issued letters of marque and reprisal,
so many of privately armed and equipped persons and entities as, in
his judgment, the service may require, with suitable instructions to
the leaders thereof, to employ all means reasonably necessary to
seize outside the geographic boundaries of the United States and its
territories the person and property of Osama bin Laden, of any al
Qaeda co-conspirator, and of any conspirator with Osama bin Laden
and al Qaeda who are responsible for the air piratical aggressions
and depredations perpetrated upon the United States of America on
September 11, 2001, and for any planned future air piratical
aggressions and depredations or other acts of war upon the United
States of America and her people.

This also indicates that Ron Paul thinks that boogie man Osama is
still alive and at large and a danger to our country - rather than
the real terrorists in the white house.

3) H.R.2605 - I will just copy the text of the bill so you can all
read for yourselves: Title: To establish a sunset for the
Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of
2002 (Public Law 107-243).

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Sunset of Public Law 107-243 Act of
2007'.

SEC. 2. SUNSET OF PUBLIC LAW 107-243.

The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution
of 2002 (Public Law 107-243) is amended by adding at the end the
following new section:

SEC. 5. SUNSET.

`This joint resolution shall cease to be effective beginning 180
days after the date of the enactment of the Sunset of Public Law 107-
243 Act of 2007.'

This all sounds like it is a good anti-war sort of bill, now doesn't
it? Well until he adds this next section which makes the first part
obsolete.

SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. Nothing in the amendment made by
section 2 of this Act shall be construed to prevent or prohibit
Congress in the 180-day period beginning on the date of the
enactment of this Act from--

(1) reauthorizing Public Law 107-243, with or without amendment, as
appropriate; and
(2) passing a new authorization for the use of military force
against Iraq or a declaration of war against Iraq, as appropriate.

Now to be fair there are two more bills that seem anti war in their
organic form except for one small detail. Let me tell you about them
and see if you can figure out why they aren't anti-war, really.

4) H. CON. RES. 46

Expressing the sense of Congress that all United States Armed Forces
should be withdrawn from South Korea and the United States should
end its defense guarantee of South Korea.

5)H.CON.RES.255 : Expressing the sense of the Congress that the
United States military should not become involved in the Liberian
civil war, either alone or as part of a United Nations peacekeeping
force.

They sound great, eh? They sure do, all except for the part where
they are house concurrent resolutions as is indicated by the H.Con.
Res preceeding the number. The problem with this sort of legislation
is it does not have the force of law behind it and is basically used
to express an opinion of congress. Ron Paul, out of all the
legislation he introduces rarely introduces these types of bills -
but when it comes to anti-war legislation - he likes the kind that
doesn't have the force of law behind it.

Ron Paul is just about as lame as the democrats with their excuses -
did you guys hear about those newsletters "The Ron Paul Newsletters"
which were filled with remarks only a bigot would make and racial
slurs? Well did you get to see his response to those bigot
accusations?

Check it out:

Artilcle 195053

For those of you who don't know what is going on. Ron Paul had a
newsletter called the Ron Paul Newsletter which circulated back in
his district. The Newsletter printed and circulated many statements
which were without a doubt bigotted, racist in nature and Ron Paul
claims he didn't write them. There was no signature to the writings
on some of the things written in that newsletter - and apparently
people assumed that Ron Paul wrote them since his name was plastered
over the front page and all. However, Ron Paul denies that he wrote
them. He also claims that the only reason all these things are
coming up now, ten years after the fact, is because of the political
witch hunt. The only problem with that is, it still doesn't address
the question of whether he is a racist - now or then.

Ron Paul claims that he doesn't know who wrote them. It was ten
years ago. He claims that not all publishers know who wrote what
only the editor does and the editor is responsible for the day to
day activities and writings. He claims though, that there were
changes made and people coming and going and he doesn't know who
wrote them. He also claims that back when these newsletters were
printed and came out - that the people in his district believed him
when he said he didn't write them. He neglected to mention though,
that if he was offended by such things printed in his name, why he
didn't find out then, before all the time had passed and the changes
made, who wrote them in his name.

Needless to say, his defense of his bigoted newsletter is lame. He
is either irresponsible or not interested in the things that happen
in his name or with his signature. Then there is the possibility
that he did write them or that he simply was not offended by the
racist comments that appeared in his newsletter which would explain
why he never did anything to refute the claims or sue the person who
claimed they were his words - by not claiming their own words.
Whatever, there is nothing that appears to stand well in his defense
of not being a bigot.

Ron Paul claims he is not a racist. He claims that this can be noted
as truth because he is against the war on drugs. He says that only
14 percent of the blacks in this country commit crimes related to
drugs. He also notes that 67 percent of the blacks are in prisons
and comments on how unfair our criminal/justice system is toward
minorities and blacks in this country. He also takes credit for
having the most support from the black communities then any other
candidate. He says his anti-war stand is also anti-racist since
blacks and minorities are the ones that suffer the most in such
wars.

I took a look at Ron Paul's introduced and sponsored legislation
over the last 5 or 6 years and looked for anything that might
indicate that Ron Paul is against racism and not the racist that
such racial slurs in his newsletter indicates that he is and this is
what I found.

H.J. Res 46:

Proposing to amend the constitution of the United States. This
amendment would deny citizenship to any persons born in the United
States whose parents were not citizens themselves.

H.R 1405: This would disqualify people from receiving federal funds
if they were convicted in any crime, local, state or federal. Here
is a piece of the text:

SEC. 2. DISQUALIFICATION FOR FEDERAL FUNDING.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any recipient of Federal
funds shall be disqualified for Federal funding of any type if, at a
time when the recipient is receiving Federal funds for any of the
recipient's activities, the recipient is found by any Federal agency
or Federal or State court to have--

(1) made a false statement on an application for Federal funds;
(2) violated any Federal law or regulation or State or local law
punishable by imprisonment for at least 6 months or a fine of at
least $5,000; and
(3) aided or abetted the violation of any law or regulation
described in paragraph (2).

EXCUSE ME FOR NOTING - Government assistance would mean military
assistance for returning soldiers or injured soldiers - which he
notes that minorities make up much of the military and suffer the
most from wars overseas. Since many soldiers return to a life of
crime if they return at all due to the insufficient way our
government provides for their return to civil life - I would say
that this is exactly the opposite of what he claims. This would also
affect any medical or living assistance provided to minorities and
blacks such as welfare, food stamps, housing supplements, child care
etc. which many blacks and minorities rely on to live because our
society doesn't give them the same opportunities as whites - they
are repressed, denied housing and denied jobs which would allow them
to make livable wages and safe homes to raise a family. He, himself
notes how unfairly the judicial system treats the minorities and
blacks - and many blacks are in prison for crimes they didn't
commit. There are tons of statistics which prove this fact. So you
figure it out...the guy is a fucking liar!

And here is another bill he sponsored and introduced:

H.R.3071 :

To prohibit the provision of Federal funds to the housing-related
government-sponsored enterprises and to remove certain competitive
advantages granted under law to such enterprises.

This would eliminate housing projects and funds for minorities to
assist them in purchasing houses etc.

And this bill here is another one he sponsored and introduced just
last year:

H.R.3217

Title: To limit the issuance of student and diversity immigrant
visas to aliens who are nationals of Saudi Arabia, countries that
support terrorism, or countries not cooperating fully with United
States antiterrorism efforts.

This is not a man who recognizes racism as a problem - and in fact
legislates with racism to further oppress the already oppressed and
suffering.

Please note that Ron Paul has been offered money by the White
Supremacy special interest group and although he denied the
contribution (no one is claiming that he is stupid - they are
claiming that he is a racist) one still has to wonder what potential
a special interest group like that saw in a man like Ron Paul...but
I bet we can easily discern what that might be.

Also note that Ron Paul states in this piece

Article 19028

"As I stated on the floor of the U.S. House on April 20, 1999: 'I
rise in great respect for the courage and high ideals of Rosa Parks
who stood steadfastly for the rights of individuals against unjust
laws and oppressive governmental policies.'"

From what I understand - Ron Paul was the only dissenting vote in
Congress when Congress voted to award the Congressional Gold Medal
to Rosa Parks. To be fair about this, he voted against most
congressional gold medals because he thought that it was
unconstitutional to make the tax payers pay for Congressional Gold
medals but Ron Paul had a habit of donating 100 toward any gold
medalist that he believed deserved a gold medal - as long as the tax
payers didn't have to pay for it and Rosa Parks was not one of those
for which he offered his own money.

I also thought it was interesting that White Pride Nationalist sites
sponsor and support Ron Paul for President and they have
advertisements on their sites which are approved by Ron Paul but not
ones you would usually see on just any old site. Check it out.

Storm Front Forum scroll to the bottom and see the thread "What Ron
Paul must do to win" and also check out his advertisement in that
forum/site.

So racism, is not a lesser of any evil - it is one of the truest
forms of evil and it looks like Ron Paul may be a true racist -
without a doubt. At least in my eyes.

He also claims that he is against the war on drugs, you know,
because the blacks in this country suffer from all these ridiculous
drug crimes. I found one thing he legislated in the past three
congresses and here it is:

H.R. 1009 -

Whooopie - he wants to redefine marijuana so it doesn't
include "industrial hemp" - That is HARDLY a war on drugs since hemp
doesn't even get you high! Thank God I didn't hang out with him in
highschool! it would have been NO FUN!

Ron Paul claims that he is about the individuals constitutional
rights - except that he forgets to mention it is those individuals
that work as CEO's in corporations - like for instance, I am certain
that Ken Lay would have voted for him had he heard about this piece
of legislation that Ron Paul introduced.

H.R.1657 :

To ensure financial regulations do not harm economic
competitiveness, nor deprive Americans of due process of law, by
repealing provisions of Federal law that hold corporate chief
executive officers criminally liable for the content and quality of
their companies' financial report, even when the chief executive
officers had no intention to engage in criminal behavior, and had
taken all reasonable steps to assure the accuracy of the statement.

I could go on and on - how he thinks that people shouldn't be able
to sue corporations for false advertising or pharmaceutical
companies for claiming that their product does something that it
doesn't do. He also thinks it is okay for your doctor to bargain
with your health care insurer (those that pay his bill). Obviously,
this will adversely affect your care - which may be why it is
supposed to be illegal currently - but Ron Paul claims that this
will provide for more quality care and better health service. And
this is coming from a medical doctor. A real fucking healer, eh?
After this legislation, I would assume that he won't have many
patients left.

We all should know by now that Ron Paul is anti-choice (pro-life as
they call it). He believes that life begins at conception and not
only does he think the government should stay out of your life and
parks and not interfere with legislating for the environment but he
does make an exception to government interference but only when it
comes to YOUR UTERUS!

H.R.1545 :

To prohibit Federal officials from paying any Federal funds to any
individual or entity that performs partial-birth abortions.

So any doctor which choses to save a woman's life - which is the
only time late term abortions are performed by the way - otherwise
they are illegal - is if the mother's life is in danger due to the
pregnancy - they get punished for being a life saver.

And following this piece of legislation he introduces the following:

H.R.1546 :

To provide that the inferior courts of the United States do not have
jurisdiction to hear abortion-related cases.

Now he wants it to be illegal for any court to declare that you have
a right to life (liberty and the pursuit of happiness) and to
adjudicate such where late term abortion (a life saving procedure
ONLY) is concerned.

Healer - Dr. Ron Paul - the man with a plan - to populate the world
with unwanted children and kill the mothers who are pregnant rather
than the unborn fetus whose continued growth will kill the mother
because you know, he is all about ridding such funding for
orphanages and welfare or support for single disabled moms. He is a
real stern god fearing man which can be noted in his legislation The
bill is...

H. R. 1547

To restore first amendment protections of religion and religious
speech.

Ron Paul thinks that the separation of church and state is
unconstitutional and deprives the religious folks of their right to
freedom of religion and free speech. He thinks that by making it
illegal to practice prayer in schools or bring up God and ideology
in government rulings and legislation that you are in effect denying
that government official, teacher, school board or whatever their
right to practice their freedom of religion and their right to free
speech. He believes that religion should be intertwined with
government whenever a government official wishes to do so - and
schools should be allowed to force prayer whenever a school wishes
to do so...I mean can you imagine? This guy is no threat to the
current establishment, HE IS ONE OF THEM!

Fuck education and our constitutional rights to have a basic
education. He thinks that should be left up to the states and the
federal government should have no jurisdiction nor obligation
thereof. While I believe they should stay the hell out of the books
and the lesson plans - and leave that up to the parents whose kids
educate at that particular school - I also think that the federal
government is obligated to ensure the states fulfill their duty to
educate the children within the state. Not Ron Paul - he says leave
it up to the states entirely and we have all seen how well they
manage that on their own.

Ayn Rand and Ron Paul view the environment and the earth virtually
the same. Both view it as a resource and Ron Paul thinks that the
environment is not important enough in comparison to the free market
and therefore there should be no environmental laws imposed on those
poor oppressed corporations. In fact, there is a lot of
commonalities between Ayn Rand and Ron Paul. He thinks we should
privatize the parks and his answer to the high oil prices aren't to
regulate the energy companies but to allow drilling in ANWR - fuck
the people and the fact that the majority have already said NO
DRILLING IN ANWR how many times already? Ron Paul likes to spew the
support he gets from the military like even more than McCain gets -
well ain't that something - whoopie - In fact, if this is true then
perhaps the military personnel might be interested in this piece of
legislation introduced and sponsored by Ron Paul.

H. R. 1404

"To direct the Secretary of Defense to present a ribbon of
appropriate design to all persons who, while a member of the Armed
Forces serving on active duty, were exposed to ionizing radiation as
a result of participation in a test of atomic weapons."

Ron Paul thinks that those guinea pigs (involuntary, I am sure)
should get cancer AND a ribbon for their unknown sacrifice. What a
guy, eh?

Just another twisted sick fuck running for President, people.
Nothing to get all fucking heated over - nothing to go on and on
about all over public forums and slip in Ron Paul campaign slogans
every fucking chance you get. No real reason to have a revolution -
especially in his name...there are plenty of REAL revolutions to
have over GOOD reasons and WORTHY purposes - and trust me when I
tell you, RON PAUL IS NOT ONE OF THEM.

I'm not going to go on and on quoting all this legislation - in it's
original Ron Paul form which proves me right and all you Ron Paul
fans a sandwich short of a picnic...I'm just going to suggest that
you not take my word for it. Instead why don't you go to the
congressional record and investigate yourselves for fucking once.
HOW MANY TIMES MUST WE BE MADE FOOLS OF? HOW MANY MORE PROMISES TO
STOP THE WARS MUST WE SIT AROUND WAITING TO BE FULFILLED FOR MONTHS
WHILE THE BLOOD POURS OF THE INNOCENT? HOW MANY MORE ASSHOLE
POLITICIANS ARE YOU GOING TO SUPPORT BEFORE YOU GET IT THREW YOUR
THICK FUCKING HEADS THAT THEY AREN"T ON OUR SIDE! THEY DON"T FUCKING
WORK FOR US! THE SYSTEM DOESN"T WORK! AND NO ONE DWELLING WITHIN THE
CESSPOOL OF THE US GOVERNMENT IS GOING TO ATTEMPT TO FIX ANYTHING AT
ALL FOR US! THEY ARE ON THEIR OWN SIDE! IT"S US AGAINST THEM - and
OFF WITH THEIR FUCKING HEADS! Don't send them your fucking money and
make all this effort like they are something that they are not. WAKE
THE FUCK UP! Ron Paul is just another scum sucking, lyin', pig,
capitalist with blood on his hands and dollar signs in his eyes and
a complete indifference to the suffering that they have planned for
us and that they have already created for people all over the world.
Seriously people - use your fucking heads and do some fucking work
before you throw your support behind ANYONE! HAVEN"T YOU LEARNED
YOUR LESSON ALREADY! SHEEEEEEEEEEESH!
(c) 2008 Liz DeLong
http://www.issuesandalibis.org/