The real killer behind Virginia Tech. massacre (1)
484. Gunman is a professional killer(4) (5/13/07)
6. The gunman is not Cho Seung Hui.
(1) The gunman is a professional killer. Cho is a new comer. Cho bought the gun on March 13. (There were different saying about the other gun, but it was bought around that time too. ) Only one month before the shooting case. He practiced in a shooting range on Mar. 22. That's all his relationship to the gun.
But according to Professor of Criminology:
Quote, "Seung-Hui Cho Was a Mind Controlled Assassin
Charles Mesloh, Professor of Criminology at Florida Gulf Coast University, told NBC 2 News that he was shocked Cho could have killed 32 people with two handguns absent expert training. Mesloh immediately assumed that Cho must have used a shotgun or an assault rifle.
"I'm dumbfounded by the number of people he managed to kill with these weapons," said Mesloh, "The only thing I can figure is that he got close to them and he simply executed them."
Mesloh said the killer performed like a trained professional, "He had a 60% fatality rate with handguns - that's unheard of given 9 millimeters don't kill people instantly," said Mesloh, stating that the handguns Cho used were designed for "plinking at cans," not executing human beings."
(http://infowars.com/articles/us/va_tech_shooter_was_mind_controlled_assassin.htm)
From media report, we know the weapon is not assault rifle. It is the 9 millimeter handgun and the killer shot at distance, (shooting at the door, not the execute style) So the gunman is a professional of the professionals.
(2) Cho was 5'8". Gunman is ""He was, I would say, about a little bit under six feet tall, young looking, Asian, dressed sort of strangely, almost like a Boy Scout, very short-sleeved light, tan shirt and some sort of ammo vest with black over it. He just stepped within five feet of the door and started firing.
"He seemed very thorough about it, getting almost everyone down. I was trying to act dead," the freshman mechanical engineering student says. "He left for about 30 seconds, came back in, did almost exactly the same thing. I guess he heard us still talking.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070417.wxshootingticktock17/BNStory/specialComment
(3) The gunman didn't want to be recognized.
If Cho planned this tragedy, he knew it was a way of no return. He was ready to die himself. It was unnecessary to cover up himself with masks or sunglass..... But the gunman did all the cover up. He seemed know he would be alive and didn't want to be recognized later.
Quote, " Pai Cheong Ming - 27 years old, an engineering student, came from S. Korea - was wounded in breast and arm and was in hospital. He told "Central Daily" (S. Korean Newspaper): "The gunman wore a mask covering face, his brown cap wore low to his eyes. He wore glass," (Though the news didn't say it's a sunglass, I think it should be, because Cho Seung Hui wore contact lens that morning according to his roommate. Or there was another killer.)
Pai Cheong Ming's description was quite different from others. I never saw it from "mainstream media". Perhaps because it would contradict to the Authority's story. I read it from a Chinese newspaper "The Epoch Times" April 20.
(4) If Cho real hated the "rich kids, debauchery and deceitful charlatans", then there must be some model he knew. He shoud target on these models. In fact, he chose unknown as victims.
All witnesses referred the killer as "gunman" or "he". No one call the killer "Cho". It means they don't know Cho. Only media describe the killer as Cho. Did they witness the scene?
(5) Another mark of Feds: Silence the witness.
For a random killer, Cho should pick up easy one to shoot at. He should go on to other classroom where there were plenty of easy targets. But he came back to kill the survivor. "He seemed very thorough about it", "I was trying to act dead" he came back "I guess he heard us still talking" (see reference in (2)) Cho has no reason to be thorough on people he didn't know.
It is only a mark of Mafia or the Feds. They kill witness of their crime. Mafia has no motive in this case. Feds does. (see "480. The real killer behind Virginia Tech. massacre (1) (4/23/07)")
(to be continued)
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this comment
Code 92,
The best way is you ask Chicago Sun-Times about if it was true. Instead of try to discredit here.
April 16, 2007
BY MICHAEL SNEED Sun-Times Columnist
Sneed hears authorities were investigating whether the gunman who killed 32 people in a rampage on the Virginia Tech campus was a Chinese national who arrived in the United States last year on a student visa.
The 25-year-old man being investigated for the deadliest college carnage in U.S. history reportedly arrived in San Francisco on a United Airlines flight on Aug. 7, 2006, on a visa issued in Shanghai, the source said. Investigators had not linked him to any terrorist groups, the source added."
------------
483. The video tape of Cho Seung Hui (3) (5/8/07)
5. The man in video tape is not Cho Seung Hui.
(1) Cho's acquaintance and his roommates don't recognize the man in video tape.
Re: "A pastor at a Korean church in Centreville watched the tapes on television with his family. He told the Seoul newspaper JoongAng Ilbo, " All my family said that was not the Seung-Hui we knew. It was the first time we saw him speaking in full sentences." ("Shooter/ A lifetime of silence" Mercury News, 4/22/07)
Re: "April 18, MSNBC, Scarborough Country -- Michele Kosinski reports at about 10:13 PM eastern time that Cho's roommates say they do not recognize him in the film from the package sent to NBC."
http://www.rense.com/general76/cho.htm
Go to that site to compare the pictures. Though they are similar, the ratio of the head is a big difference. (the ratio of the length to width of the head) Different camera won't produce such big difference.
(2) The man in video has a different temperament from Cho Seung Hui.
We all know Cho was "extraordinary lonely", "a life time of silence". He is also very shy and avoid to be in focus. Re: "When a candidate for student council visited the suite this year to pass out candy and ask for votes, Cho refused even to make eye contact.". "Mary Shaw said yearbooks indicate that Cho's only extracurricular activity was the science club during his sophomore year. He did not supply a picture of himself for his senior yearbook.". ("Shooter/ Classmates feared he would kill", Mercury News, 4/18/07)
But in video, the man liked to show off himself. He made different posts with guns, even with a hammer. He spoke fluent sentences. He stares at the focus. In his package, there is not only an 1,800 words statement, (For a real Cho, that's enough) there are also video tape and 43 photographs. Is that too much for him?
(3) These characters don't fit for Cho, but fit for Feds. The video tape resembles other "terrorist" tapes used to broadcast in TV. Those tapes used to do a negative propaganda on "terrorists" themselves. Painted themselves extreme, violent, savage by arms in hand, shooting machine guns, or even beheading. Those tapes used to fit the demand of Pentagon and the Feds - "Don't look for other suspects. I, (terrorist, or criminal) did it." Is there anything else more convenient to solve a case by someone to confess?
Re: "U.S. Government Caught Red-Handed Releasing Staged Al-Qaeda Videos"
(http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/october2006/051006redhanded.htm)
(4) An interesting message for reference.
Quote, "VIDEO PROOF THAT NBC FOOTAGE WAS NOT SHOT BY CHO ALONE
Posted By: Never_Surrender (Send E-Mail (http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?bem=103149)
Date: Thursday, 19 April 2007, 10:01 p.m.
......
Well let me ask a question then, if he shot it by himself, WHY is the camera shaking, like someone ELSE is holding it?
The CHO character is sitting perfectly still in FRONT of the camera and not touching the camera YET it is moving!
At one point in this video I could swear I hear someone cough or clear their throat off camera and at another point I think someone hits the camera and you can hear the BUMP sound or the THUD sound that it makes and it shakes a little....
I believe that what we have here is video proof that CHO did NOT make this video, there was someone else holding the camera, again, I do NOT even believe it is Cho in this video but I have covered that in another post.
Here is the video....
Embedded video does not appear to be showing up so here is link to video....
(http://www.vloggingtheapocalypse.com/view_video.php?viewkey=3efbc24c7d2583be6925 NS)
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/IssuesAndAlibis_The_Forum/message/18347)
(To be continued)
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this comment
I don't really trust the Chicago Sun-Times. But thanks for the advice.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this comment
But you won't answer the question? It's a perfectly fair question. A lot of people might make the same mistake you probably did. You want to call others to responsibility but you can't take it for yourself? That's right. I'm an FBI agent. I'm here to defame your message, because you're a... threat... and the government is terrified of you.. and.... well you get the idea. My mission (in full disclosure) was to perhaps help you understand something. It seems you are well beyond that though. Also I personally trained 6, 5 man fire teams to storm the VA Tech campus and kill precisely 32 people. We, (the government) are so good at this that no one saw us, (in fact they saw the guy we wanted them to see) in the act. We've been working on invisibility cloaks so that we can move undetected over American University campuses and kill at our leisure. Also on top of that, I am the one who flew the planes (or remote control toys) into the Pentagon, the WTC and the field in Pennsylvania! I shot Kennedy! I killed the dinosaurs! Someone dressed like me, but not me, keeps bombing mosques in Iraq! Hell I'm responsible for Howard Taft's (former President of the United States) large belly! When the government wants you to think of a conspiracy, I'm the one they call! I also shot Lincoln, but not in Fords Theater. I actually shot him at a farm down the road, but then I carried his lifeless body all the way to the theater and shot him again, for no reason! I am responsible for the death of Bobby Kennedy! Sirhan who? Nah, I shot him, under my cloak of invisibility, and blamed it on Sirhan. And now, I'm coming to defame your message. I'm going to call people who may or may not have read what you happen to be spouting this week and tell them the truth as far as the government is concerned!
Simply stating opinions as facts like you do isn't right. That's what the Grand Old Party (or Republican party) does, it's also what Fox news does. You're trying to pull something over on people, and it's not working. And being a government agent I can fully swear to you that it's not going to work.
(I feel I must clarify. Obviously I'm not a government agent, nor did I kill the dinosaurs or even Bobby Kennedy. I do however feel the need to repel anyone's irrational argument that states the government is responsible for this lunatics actions at VA Tech. Apparently the government had it's hand in Columbine too. It seems anytime something like a massacre happens it's a government ploy to do.. something.. no one ever explains what. If it wasn't so insulting to our intelligence, it might be funny.)
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this comment
I beg to dis-concure with you on a few extremely important points yet totally irrelevant ones none the less...and as you know, in this day and age especially, are as legitimate a reason as any to go to war to prove that no one has much longer to wait...to see how the ending is going to turn out for us...ALL.
How do I obtain a membership card stating that I am not now, nor have I ever been employed by, nor will I ever now pass the medical exam to be a member of the FBI, the CIA, the KGB, Mossad, al Quada, the Chinese Secret Police, Scrambled Skulls and Brains, Wal-Mart Security Personnel and etc. etc. etc. along with, and including but not limited to, a certified statement notarized by Abraham Lincoln...that I did not assassinate him?
Personally, I would like to reopen the dead file surrounding the assassination of Julius Ceaser and the mistaken conclusion that he was killed by a conspiracy in the Senate of that day, who all allegedly had as a motive to kill the Ceaser, because he was becoming a would be emperor. However I would like you to ask yourself this question, "Why did he really die from apparently knowing so many of the wrong Senators...when they all died with in 50 years of his death?" And to add more mystery surrounding his actual murder...some of them gave up the ghost under the most mysterious of circumstances. At least a few, or maybe even more I hypothesize, expired from having diseases that were not treatable during that time of humanity's evolution. So what, I further inquire, was the evolutionary advantage to the most powerful of that time contracting such illnesses? And what kind of immortality does that indicate that they really received from expending so much effort...on a lovely and bloody Roman afternoon?"
Is it possible that Shakespeare was a part of the Illuminati or the Masons or, perish the thought, the nebulous Rossiscrutions? Is it any wonder then that such an infantile group as "All I Need Are Scrambled Skulls And Brains Because I Tongue The Right Assholes" would arise to give us all so much fodder to hold them up to such ridicule and humiliation for all time? Because you simply can not make these kind of things up.
Nevertheless, as for breaking records of the past, however noble or infamous they are...my bet is on the future having a more clear yard stick to go on to see just how badly one could eclipse those records gone by.
And as hopeless as it might sound, or maybe promising in it's own right, I am simply not as good a judge as time will be in this case...but I think for the most part nearly EVERYONE is choosing to ignore the fact that there is a festering hatred by solitary individuals EVERYWHERE that society deliberately abandons at birth for not fitting in. And those I am speaking of, who end up inevitably, and unsurprisingly, embracing a violent nihilism, view with nothing but utter contempt the "famous" for their born to wealth, political power and mouthing that empty promise that they alone are so beautiful they will end poverty, war, injustice, etc by holding onto their riches. And some of these violent nihilist(and on this one I do agree with them) see the far too deified and obscenely wealthy poets and song writers of love...not as heroes...but as exploiters and betrayers of the ideals they claim to proselytize.
As for myself, and why I personally have never embraced violent nihilism, it is honestly for some reason that will remain forever a mystery even to myself because I sure as fuck never remember any God damn mother fucking Camelot going on while I have been around. I do remember some real horse shit about a "beautiful" royal family ruling the kingdom from sea to shining sea while I was about 12 and alone with eight younger brothers and sisters while my mother was in a mental institution and taking a rest from having us wait on her hand and foot. And I remember further an absentee father who lived across town...and who gladly managed to continue to forget about us even during that time. So we seven older kids ended up taking turns being absent from school to watch the younger 3 year old twin boys. And among those "older" babysitters...were also my twin sisters who were only 5 years old at the time. I thought that was normal...I think all of us grown up before our time children did.
Maybe I am just missing something in this argument so let me pose a question to everyone. Was Camelot like the 60's and if you remember it...you weren't there? Or is it just me who finds something bizarre, to say the least, about after Camelot was gone of a story of a woman artist/poet who suddenly comes into possession of a quarter of a billion dollars because her husband is assassinated by one of those violent types of nihilists who then says to his mourners, "Don't send flowers...send me the money!"
Or am I just out of focus and not trying hard enough to understand a conversation between the President of the most powerful country in the world, along with his brother and born with a silver spoon to rule as well as the Attorney General, and some soon to be assassinated nigger in a jail, I think in Montgomery, in which they asked the "boy", "Is there anything we can do for you, Martin?" Maybe Martin didn't ask for martial law to be declared like I would have but I'll tell you if I ever find myself in a situation like that with that pig cocksucker George W. asking me if he can do anything I sure as fuck will negotiate a few pizzas out of a frigging phone call from someone who has that much more bread than I do.
Because I know for a truth more holy than gold crowns and silver spoons...that not a mother fucking one of any of those, and these present, pretend princes and princesses wearing one, and for sure born with one...could handle wearing...The Crown of an Iron Age. But then some of us like talking to cherubs even in mental institutions as well as being loved by our Demons...whose voices we can hear sighing...even in a summer breeze.
"Ask not what your county can do for you...but ask what you can do for your country!".......(what they don't want you to know and for real what is the truth, some frigging Roman politician from at least two millenniums ago plus)
"Which reminds me...when a great politician dies sometimes a cherub will shed a tear, mostly out of relief...but when a clown dies...even Demons are not consoled by weeping.".......(is it really that important that you should care?)
"I was born in prison...my mother tried holding up a bank."......One of My Brothers In The Forces Of Chaos And Anarchy And Among The Holiest of the Holiest...Crown Princes of the Iron Age
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this comment
Code 92,
Mission failed. Try some other trick.
-----------
481. Feds ordered stand down (2) (4/28/07)
4. A strange "stand down" after the first shooting occurred at 7:15. The police and University did nothing to pursue the killer and warn students that there was killer(s) at large. According to authority's story, Cho was the only one did all killings. He was given a two hours and a half to do his work without a disturbance. That was indeed a very generous gift from authority and an unbelievable negligence on security rule, particularly at the time after 911.
(1) Another strange news which disappeared later. The original news said the reason of no-reaction was that information showed that killer was out of state. But it took time for killer to escape out of state, even if he took a plane. And how could they learn that? Did they knew whom he was and tracked him all the time? Since the no-reaction was from the beginning, this was a justification with big flaw. It was never heard of since. Local officials didn't know the business out of state. This news, as well as that detail of Chinese suspect, obviously was from Feds too.
(2) If you were Cho Seung Hui, once you fired the first shoot, you knew you were on a road of no-return, would you do something else? In common sense, a killer would go on with his shooting spree because he knew there was little time left for him. The police would arrive in minutes. Would you still care for mailing something? But Cho seemed think in other way. He thought of he hadn't mailed the tapes, (Authority story was that tapes was not made on 4/16) It took him one hour and three quarters to bring the tapes to post office, (7:15 - 9:01) enough time for him to have a breakfast and do a laundry if he wished. Cho didn't worry about police arrest. He was right. Police and University did response with no re-action.
(3) “Setting up a series of roadblocks, controlling access to very large pieces of property, is very much routine on any university campus in Canada and in the United States,” Though it is a criminal negligence of no-response to the first two murders in University dorm, we saw little pressure to investigate and affix the responsibility of this massacre. Because it will trace to the Feds. ( Now they may try to find a scapegoat for it) They gave the order of "stand down". They need a history worst to distract another framed case.
Quote, "Feds Ordered VA Police To Stand Down
Local authorities were told to take no action to pursue killer
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, April 20, 2007
Police and EMT workers at Virginia Tech tell us that campus police were given a federal order to stand down and not pursue killer Cho Seung-Hui as Monday's bloodshed unfolded.
Though wishing to remain anonymous for obvious reasons, we have received calls from police and EMT's who tell us that a stand down order was in place, and this is also confirmed by eyewitness Matt Kazee, who is a student at VA Tech.
Kazee talked to local EMT's and police who told him the same thing, that the order was to wait until federal back up arrived before any action was taken. This explains the complete non-response of the police in the two hour gap between Cho's first two murders and the wider rampage that would follow later that morning.
The policy of federal control over the University was put in place following a previous shooting in August 2006 in which a police officer and a hospital security guard were killed.
In addition, a former long-term University police officer, George French, told the Alex Jones Show that it is routine to seal off a campus on which a suspected gunman is loose.
“Setting up a series of roadblocks, controlling access to very large pieces of property, is very much routine on any university campus in Canada and in the United States,” said French.
“After a double homicide, when you’re looking for a dangerous fellow with a firearm, I find it unfathomable that a series of roadblocks weren’t set up…to prevent the felon from escaping.”
French could find no logical conclusion other than deliberate inaction on the part of officials. “We have another coordinated, allowed event…the parallels are so common in each case; you can write the script in advance.”
(http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=71573&sid=46a585298128996c43550b3544fce1a3)
(To be continued)
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this comment
Just one question. Where were you and at what time did you hear the local Chinese report on 4/16?
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this comment
480. The real killer behind Virginia Tech. massacre (1) (4/23/07)
I think the Virginia Tech. massacre was done by Feds.
1. A very detailed news which disappeared later
On 4/16, I heard the tragedy from local Chinese TV news. It reported that the gunman's visa was issued in Shanghai, and his entry port was San Francisco. My first thought was: "How efficient they are. They got everything right away." Then I became suspicious. Shanghai? My family came from Shanghai. San Francisco? My parents, my sisters live in San Francisco, and have their business there. Next day was 4/17, the day I alleged for the breakout of a framed case. In message of March, I alleged the Feds had collaborated with Chinese secret police for a new drug case. The V.T. killer, obviously was a Chinese, according to the news. Was that part of new plot? When people didn't know what exactly happened inside Virginia Tech. was that strange we got such a detail news on 4/16? Nobody could have that detail except Feds. And nobody could release that to the media except Feds.
Here is the reference for that news. Watch the date the news was issuing. That news now is not available in Sun-Times URL. It was replaced by some different description.
Re: "Gunman kills 32 at Virginia Tech before being killed
April 16, 2007
BY MICHAEL SNEED Sun-Times Columnist
Sneed hears authorities were investigating whether the gunman who killed 32 people in a rampage on the Virginia Tech campus was a Chinese national who arrived in the United States last year on a student visa.
The 25-year-old man being investigated for the deadliest college carnage in U.S. history reportedly arrived in San Francisco on a United Airlines flight on Aug. 7, 2006, on a visa issued in Shanghai, the source said. Investigators had not linked him to any terrorist groups, the source added."
2. The purpose of Virginia Tech. massacre
The US intelligence used to influence American people by media with psychological operation.
The news about WMD, the mushroom cloud threat, the film "300", numerous video tape of Bin Laden, Zhawahiri, Zhaqawi, the beheading tape of Nick Berg are all belong to this category. It is used to vilify Islamic and to inflame and agitate people. What if the plot was successful to their plan? People would have believed what Feds told them: the Chinese (Shanghainese) were evil people. They did drug smuggling; they massacre American students.
The most important role of V.T. killing was: it was planned to distract. I have revealed since last October to this March, in each month there was a plot. Each time I emphasized that they used Iran war as distract.
Though I talked a lot about April 17 plot, this time I haven't talked about Iran war because I found none. Did Feds abandon their tactic? No, distract is an important tactic in Feds plan. When it became a familiar one to the people, Feds replaced it by a massacre.
They killed students as many as possible to make it the worst in US history. This news withdraws public attention from other would be news such like drug case or unusual death in police brutality.
3. The Chinese killer replaced by Cho Seung Hui.
Mercury News on next day reported "Gonzales hearing postponed in wake of campus shooting". I have viewed this hearing as a mark of 4/17 plot in which Attorney General " ..... He'll have one last chance to do that, and perhaps keep his job, when he testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 17." (see #477) Now it was postponed. It means the April plot was postponed. Then will China bear the accusation of "massacre American students"?
China is a big power. When it will to bear an unsavory reputation, the payment in secret deal must be huge. Now the plot went soured. Feds had to seek another replacement.
That's why Cho Seung Hui became a killer. He is S. Korean. S. Korea, you know, a country controlled by US. (or protected by US, whatever you think) The image transfer is easy, at least it accords with the definition that "the killer is an Asian.
(To be continued.)
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are