what "election"??

The "election" of 2000 was a fraud, and 2004 was a fraud....these are/were not elections, it was a dog a pony show to placate the masses into believing they have some measure of control. And it's not like 2000 was the first time this happened. I believe the power structure just got so arrogant they didn't try that hard to hide it, as was done in previous presidential "elections".
'Yay, electronic voting machines; now we can take it easy, no more covert ops or assassinations.' What i don't understand is, since this isn't a monarchy, and the EVIDENCE of election fraud (for both 2000 and 2004) is a matter of PUBLIC RECORD...why is that guy still in the White House?? Who is the authority in this kind of situation? 'Cause there should have been someone to march over to the White House, "We have evidence of election tampering, fraud, and the civil rights violations of thousands of American citizens; you're under arrest." slapped the cuffs on him and hauled him away. I really do not understand why he was allowed to remain in office to begin with.
Why are we even talking about 2008?? Hellooooo? 'Cause the real rulers are suddenly going to allow us to have a REAL election? The kind that some other countries have, before the U.S. goes in and then puts the guy they want to be in power there. Let's do this: in the face of overwhelming odds and media sock puppets, let our silence be heard. Let's not vote. "We refuse to participate in this shameful and patently obvious circus that you engage in for our benefit" Think about it just for a minute: nobody goes to the polls, and then the sock puppets pop up and say "Mr. X just won the election by a million and a half votes." Really? Well that's some trick considering none of us voted. What are they going to do then?

Poet